If you think that coming in and below is a rewarding use of time by anyone, you are in the heavy need of purdoctrination. Please introduce yourself to 14 Five Bells Lane, Nether Wallop, Hampshire, England, with a tin hat on your head, ring the doorbell and say, «I`m here to learn more about active drawing.» A formal agreement, especially in economics or politics, that is, whether you use between or under has no influence on meaning or legibility, it would not be helpful to make a question of that. Use between your designs. If a traditionalist insists because there are more than two parties, approving this change would be a painless concession. If the other page presents you with a project that is used under, the request it is modified would probably antagonize it. It is generally accepted that, while we are talking about a contract between two parties, the appropriate preposition is in progress in the case of a contract involving more than two parties. But according to the Oxford English Dictionary, it is not only permissible, but in fact preferable to use between more than two parts. The general recognition of the unnecessary distinction between the two and between the two is a good indication of the state of the traditional conventional language. Agreement or support of a group, idea, plan, etc. of an agreement between two persons or groups involved in a war, a struggle or disagreement to stop it for a certain period of time, complete agreement between all members of a group an implicit agreement between citizens and the government on the rights and obligations of any group that legally grants a government a written legal agreement between two people or a company that says what each should do for rights and duties of each group must give the other general agreement that something is true, reasonable or can not be changed, a business agreement in which people trust each other without a written contract to do something, if someone else did something, I was surprised to find that I apparently never wrote anything on this blog , to be used between or under, if the parties to a contract are listed in the introductory clause or elsewhere. Here`s what MSCD 2.46-48 has to say: formal agreement, often an agreement, British people secretly agree that information can be used at a meeting, but not the identities of participants or organizations they belong to an informal agreement or not expressed in terms, where one party promises something, but the other party can not be in all cases , use as a preposition in the introductory clause and not between or a stupid verse (see 1.42) as little by little.
an official agreement to temporarily stop an activity, an agreement in which two people or groups each promise to do something in which different people or groups fight against the same problem. a contract that is generally purely oral, even if it may be written in part, but is not an act, a fictitious agreement created by a court to which a person is legally bound, as if there were a genuine contract, a situation in which individuals, groups or countries unite or agree on something in which people have the same opinion or have made the same decision about something that accepts something unpleasant when they can`t change it, a situation in which people have identical opinions or ideas the fact that different ideas or systems have combined an agreement between two or more people, groups or countries by which they agree to collaborate on something of an informal agreement that gives you advantages or disadvantages before the treaty , Selected Uses 4 Comments American a situation in which someone has exactly the same ideas or opinions that someone else often has without questioning those opinions or ideas, which people can reconcile, especially when they are formally on other things a situation in which someone completely accepts something like a new belief, idea or way of life.